<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Skills on NoRaincheck</title><link>https://noraincheck.github.io/tags/skills/</link><description>Recent content in Skills on NoRaincheck</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>NoRaincheck</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://noraincheck.github.io/tags/skills/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Reflecting on Mitchellh's AI Adoption Journey Blog Post</title><link>https://noraincheck.github.io/posts/reflecting-on-mitchellh-ai-adoption/</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://noraincheck.github.io/posts/reflecting-on-mitchellh-ai-adoption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been re-reading Michellh&amp;rsquo;s blog &lt;a href="https://mitchellh.com/writing/my-ai-adoption-journey"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; and reflecting on my usage of SKILL and Agentic coding, and have realised its somewhat similar and there are lessons I can learn.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="chatbot-sucks"&gt;Chatbot Sucks&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The interactivity of chatbots is nice when you&amp;rsquo;re exploring something. However it is &lt;em&gt;rare&lt;/em&gt; that you are exploring something when you are trying to deliver with agents. Instead the pattern ends up being:&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ul&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Build a prototype&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Review a prototype&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Re-build the prototype&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ul&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;LLMs have gotten so fast, so quickly, that in the interest of &lt;em&gt;speed&lt;/em&gt; having prototypes are cheap (think about the Github graveyard of ideas).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Skills are meant to be vendored</title><link>https://noraincheck.github.io/posts/skills-are-meant-to-be-vendored/</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://noraincheck.github.io/posts/skills-are-meant-to-be-vendored/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="skills-are-meant-to-be-vendored"&gt;Skills are meant to be vendored&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;July 2026&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Agent skills aren&amp;rsquo;t &amp;lsquo;code&amp;rsquo; which you use as-is. They&amp;rsquo;re designed to be vendored, forked, modified for your use.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Go copy them and modify them! Something has been &amp;rsquo;lost&amp;rsquo; in the software community where there is this obsession with &amp;lsquo;DRY&amp;rsquo;.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;But seriously, SKILLS are the equivalent of writing a &lt;code&gt;gist&lt;/code&gt; or dumping something to &lt;code&gt;pastebin&lt;/code&gt;. Stop taking it so seriously.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;With that in mind, teams that insist on a harness via a skill or Claude plugin - to me that is &lt;em&gt;madness&lt;/em&gt;. You&amp;rsquo;re standardising on how a person should write their code, or &amp;ldquo;work&amp;rdquo;. Unless the goal is for everyone to be a prompting machine I think thats the wrong outcome.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>